Monday, April 11, 2011

John Ashbery


 John Ashbery was born July 28, 1927 in Rochester, NY, and was raised near Lake Ontario. Ashbery received his undergraduate Degree from Harvard, and a Masters from Columbia University. Ashbery won many awards for his work: Lenore Marshall Poetry Prize, Pulitzer Prize for Poetry, the National Book Critics Circle Award, and the National Book Award, Bollingen Prize, Griffen Poetry Prize, and the Yale Younger Poets Series.

Ashbery I know for his exceptional writing abilities; “One moment the poem may sound like someone is talking on a bus, at another like an old work of literature or book of philosophy, then like a comic strip or a popular song.” Ashbery writes as it comes to mind without organizing his thoughts. Koch believes this is showed in his excellent execution of sestinas, which is not really done too often. Sestinas have 39 lines: Six 6 line Stanzas, a set of 6 words each line in the 6 line stanzas throughout.
The Painter is an example of a sestina:

THE PAINTER
Sitting between the sea and the buildings
He enjoyed painting the sea’s portrait.
But just as children imagine a prayer
Is merely silence, he expected his subject
To rush up the sand, and, seizing a brush,
Plaster its own portrait on the canvas.

So there was never any paint on his canvas
Until the people who lived in the buildings
Put him to work: “Try using the brush
As a means to an end. Select, for a portrait,
Something less angry and large, and more subject
To a painter’s moods, or, perhaps, to a prayer.”

How could he explain to them his prayer
That nature, not art, might usurp the canvas?
He chose his wife for a new subject,
Making her vast, like ruined buildings,
As if, forgetting itself, the portrait
Had expressed itself without a brush.

Slightly encouraged, he dipped his brush
In the sea, murmuring a heartfelt prayer:
“My soul, when I paint this next portrait
Let it be you who wrecks the canvas.”
The news spread like wildfire through the buildings:
He had gone back to the sea for his subject.

Imagine a painter crucified by his subject!
Too exhausted even to lift his brush,
He provoked some artists leaning from the buildings
To malicious mirth: “We haven’t a prayer
Now, of putting ourselves on canvas,
Or getting the sea to sit for a portrait!”

Others declared it a self-portrait.
Finally all indications of a subject
Began to fade, leaving the canvas
Perfectly white. He put down the brush.
At once a howl, that was also a prayer,
Arose from the overcrowded buildings.

They tossed him, the portrait, from the tallest of the buildings;
And the sea devoured the canvas and the brush
As though his subject had decided to remain a prayer.


The Painter is a beautiful example of the control of opacity Ashbery possesses in his writing, as well as an example how he switches pronouns “he”, “we”, “I” consistently seemingly to mislead us or keep us away.

The Instruction Manual  is a perfect example of Ashebery’s ability to be opaque:

THE INSTRUCTION MANUAL
As I sit looking out of a window of the building
I wish I did not have to write the instruction manual on the uses of a new metal.
I look down into the street and see people, each walking with an inner peace,   
And envy them—they are so far away from me!
Not one of them has to worry about getting out this manual on schedule.   
And, as my way is, I begin to dream, resting my elbows on the desk and leaning out of the window a little,
Of dim Guadalajara! City of rose-colored flowers!
City I wanted most to see, and most did not see, in Mexico!
But I fancy I see, under the press of having to write the instruction manual,   
Your public square, city, with its elaborate little bandstand!
The band is playing Scheherazade by Rimsky-Korsakov.
Around stand the flower girls, handing out rose- and lemon-colored flowers,   
Each attractive in her rose-and-blue striped dress (Oh! such shades of rose and blue),
And nearby is the little white booth where women in green serve you green and yellow fruit.
The couples are parading; everyone is in a holiday mood.
First, leading the parade, is a dapper fellow
Clothed in deep blue. On his head sits a white hat
And he wears a mustache, which has been trimmed for the occasion.
His dear one, his wife, is young and pretty; her shawl is rose, pink, and white.   
Her slippers are patent leather, in the American fashion,
And she carries a fan, for she is modest, and does not want the crowd to see her face too often.
But everybody is so busy with his wife or loved one
I doubt they would notice the mustachioed man’s wife.
Here come the boys! They are skipping and throwing little things on the sidewalk
Which is made of gray tile. One of them, a little older, has a toothpick in his teeth.
He is silenter than the rest, and affects not to notice the pretty young girls in white.
But his friends notice them, and shout their jeers at the laughing girls.   
Yet soon all this will cease, with the deepening of their years,
And love bring each to the parade grounds for another reason.
But I have lost sight of the young fellow with the toothpick.
Wait—there he is—on the other side of the bandstand,
Secluded from his friends, in earnest talk with a young girl
Of fourteen or fifteen. I try to hear what they are saying
But it seems they are just mumbling something—shy words of love, probably.
She is slightly taller than he, and looks quietly down into his sincere eyes.   
She is wearing white. The breeze ruffles her long fine black hair against her olive cheek.
Obviously she is in love. The boy, the young boy with the toothpick, he is in love too;
His eyes show it. Turning from this couple,
I see there is an intermission in the concert.
The paraders are resting and sipping drinks through straws
(The drinks are dispensed from a large glass crock by a lady in dark blue),   
And the musicians mingle among them, in their creamy white uniforms, and talk
About the weather, perhaps, or how their kids are doing at school.

Let us take this opportunity to tiptoe into one of the side streets.   
Here you may see one of those white houses with green trim   
That are so popular here. Look—I told you!
It is cool and dim inside, but the patio is sunny.
An old woman in gray sits there, fanning herself with a palm leaf fan.   
She welcomes us to her patio, and offers us a cooling drink.   
“My son is in Mexico City,” she says. “He would welcome you too   
If he were here. But his job is with a bank there.
Look, here is a photograph of him.”
And a dark-skinned lad with pearly teeth grins out at us from the worn leather frame.
We thank her for her hospitality, for it is getting late
And we must catch a view of the city, before we leave, from a good high place.
That church tower will do—the faded pink one, there against the fierce blue of the sky. Slowly we enter.
The caretaker, an old man dressed in brown and gray, asks us how long we have been in the city, and how we like it here.
His daughter is scrubbing the steps—she nods to us as we pass into the tower.
Soon we have reached the top, and the whole network of the city extends before us.
There is the rich quarter, with its houses of pink and white, and its crumbling, leafy terraces.
There is the poorer quarter, its homes a deep blue.
There is the market, where men are selling hats and swatting flies
And there is the public library, painted several shades of pale green and beige.
Look! There is the square we just came from, with the promenaders.   
There are fewer of them, now that the heat of the day has increased,   
But the young boy and girl still lurk in the shadows of the bandstand.   
And there is the home of the little old lady—
She is still sitting in the patio, fanning herself.
How limited, but how complete withal, has been our experience of Guadalajara!
We have seen young love, married love, and the love of an aged mother for her son.
We have heard the music, tasted the drinks, and looked at colored houses.   
What more is there to do, except stay? And that we cannot do.
And as a last breeze freshens the top of the weathered old tower, I turn my
gaze
Back to the instruction manual which has made me dream of Guadalajara

Questions we will explore:
What is The Instruction Manual about? And why did Ashbery choose to write about this?
As readers what did you think Ashbery wanted us to conclude?
As a Poet from The New York School of Poets do his sentiments of NYC differ from O’Hara’s?

13 comments:

  1. This poem is a great example of what the mind can give you when you’ve got nothing but mundane work to focus on. Can you blame the man for daydreaming about young love, a mother’s love, walking around on a beautiful day, when it’s his job to write an instruction manual? Please. That’s got to be worse than a Ken Burns documentary while construction workers are working on the roof next door. However, it’s beautiful that a mind like Ashbery’s can even tap into an imaginative hemisphere of his brain while given a task so separate.

    Before I read the poem, I read that this poem was a great example of opaque poetry. I’m thinking, opaque poetry? I thought opals and onyx’s were opaque—not written words. Alas, I got what the professor meant after I read it. He jumps around from people to places all in one thought—that is very unclear. Like Brakhage, I’m not sure that it his goal to make sense himself. I see him as more of a romanticized poet, seeing things not as the are but for what the feeling imposed is. For example, this line really struck me:

    “Around stand the flower girls, handing out rose- and lemon-colored flowers, Each attractive in her rose-and-blue striped dress (Oh! such shades of rose and blue),”

    Rose and lemon are not colors, how silly, right? But, Homer Simpson did say that his favorite donut flavor was purple. Ashbery and Homer Simpson, (we all now Homer isn’t real, but someone did write his dialogue) sometimes see things differently. Perhaps Ashbery wrote with a sky pen and sat on a cherry chair, and Homer’s favorite flavor truly without satirical implements is in fact, purple.

    The point is, we don’t know. As said in class it’s impossible to really know what someone is thinking much less how they are feeling at any given moment because we don’t possess their brains. But if this poem can allude to the happiness yourself can create out of thin air it’s most certainly worth reading.

    So, I think it’s about creating your own happiness, which is essential for you, me, and everyone else in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ashberry is a beautiful poet. The word choice and the seemingly mastery of his art form is wonderful. The first two lines of "The Painter" read: "Sitting between the sea and the buildings
    He enjoyed painting the sea’s portrait." How amazing is that? It's so innocent and so...wonderful. The imagery of just someone sitting there, painting the sea seems so calming. Almost dream-like. It made me happy. He is definitely my favorite poet out of the ones we read thus far.

    The way he mixes reality with dreamscapes makes it even better. It's clear without being too explicit, yet vague enough to have more meaning than what is on the page. Truly an artist; a master craftsman.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was glad to see when I did some research on Ashbery that he is actually still alive today. His mind can still be picked at about his poems and his motivations. He is not someone who has passed who we are forced to think of as being larger than life. I like the fact that he can be all over the place with his ideas and word. I feel like he brings a new perspective to literature. His poems are very beautiful and give me a sense of peace when I read them. The imagery I get when he mentions the sea, buildings, and the children are a beautiful and peaceful one.

    My personal favorite is " The Instruction Manuel." In the beginning he mentions the people walking with a sense of inner peace and says how he envies that there so far away made me really think about people and myself. Being around peaceful people actually gives you a sense of inner peace. A persons attitude will rub off on you whether it is calm or crazy. I also like when he says, "

    "His dear one, his wife, is young and pretty; her shawl is rose, pink, and white.
    Her slippers are patent leather, in the American fashion,
    And she carries a fan, for she is modest, and does not want the crowd to see her face too often.
    But everybody is so busy with his wife or loved one
    I doubt they would notice the mustachioed man’s wife."

    I think that is beautiful. The fact that everyone has inner peace and is in their own world with the person they love. Isn't that hard to find? People are always involved with other peoples drama. The moment described is of of happiness, peace, and beauty. It's almost like there is too much good and all the negativity is no where to be found.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The phrase, “no rhyme or reason,” has been on my mind this week while reading Ashbery. “No rhyme or reason” -- I’m pretty sure -- is not a descriptor of Ashbery’s work, and I was struggling with putting a finger on the reason for its prominence in my thoughts, until earlier today upon re-reading “Some Trees” when I started to think about what has rhyme and/or reason.

    Although this descriptor may have been borne from romantic ideas of poems that had actual rhyme and rational reasoning, it has been used and used in context outside of poetry. This, coupled with changing motivations and formal concerns in poetry, has led it to take on a broader meaning, a meaning that can be reapplied to poetry as "a structure of thought."

    A poem, certainly a successful one, has a structure of thought. Ashbery's poetry does not necessarily progress by way of a structure of rational thought; rather, resisting standard reason (thus the basic denotation of "no rhyme or reason" may apply), the poems concern structures of thought as a subjective abstraction. Structures of thought become the elusive subject (insofar as an Ashbery poem has a subject).

    To clarify, structures of thought are a subjective concern instead of a means of composition. Sound familiar?

    ReplyDelete
  6. What makes Ashbery a pleasure to read is the imagination he awakens within us and the escapist nature of his poetry. It's one thing to dramatize the perceived simple aspects of life but it's quite another when it comes to his choice of analogies:
    "He chose his wife for a new subject,
    Making her vast, like ruined buildings,
    As if, forgetting itself, the portrait
    Had expressed itself without a brush."
    The illusion of grandeur that is presented here is juxtaposed by the contradictory nature of the subject question, here being his wife. When one thinks of ruined buildings, you think of a sense of negativity due to the progressing destruction. Yet, at the same time, we can't help but be amazed by it. Applying this to describe the physical representation of his wife puts us in his mindframe to what he wants to perceive as opposed to what is actually there. It's a grand distraction. Like watching a movie that focuses on the actor's conversation and suddenly, the next scene is that of a panaromic view of the city as if it's part of the conversation as well. It throws the viewer off. As for Ashbery's poem, it's the kind of distraction that calls for the emphasis on the grander scheme.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I absolutely loved The Painter. I found it to be one of the few poems that has a clear internal rhythm. The words are beautiful as are the sounds. I did not like The Instruction manual nearly as much, probably because it was so long-winded. I did find myself hanging on how he describes seeing love in their eyes ("Obviously she is in love. The boy, the young boy with the toothpick, he is in love too;
    His eyes show it.") That was the part of the poem that actually resonated with me. In my opinion, Ashbery wants us to be aware of our thoughts, and the places our minds go when we may not even realize it, thus he writes about where his mind wanders while reading an instruction manual. We all do it, zone out while doing some sort of mundane task, that is the easy part. The hard part is being able to follow where ones mind takes you, or better yet, having some sense of control over it. Overall, I'm not sure if what I wrote has made any sense, but if it were not for the last line of The Instruction Manual I would have not appreciated it nearly as much.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I loved John Ashbury poems there is a lot of feeling and romance that goes into play.
    His imagination has the spunk of young love. All the excitement and build up yet the natural urge to crave more, which usual takes you on a different spin. His romantic ways are more classic and deep hearted. Ashbury also sends you on a imaginary path when you read his poems and you become aware of things that you didn’t realize before, until it completed. He spent a lot time alone while working. During those time he only had himself and his mind. With only himself for entertainment he explored different avenues of sporadic thoughts. For example “ There is the poorer quarter, it homes a deep blue, There is the market, when men are selling hats and swatting flies And there is the public library, painted several shades of pale green and beige.” Visually you are taken to many different vistas yet at the end of you can imagine the whole surrounded of this place he has placed you in. I like his format; it’s a good read.


    Elizabeth Nunez

    ReplyDelete
  9. That exercise in class was very funny. But I can hardly see a deference between what we did and what this guy has done in his life.
    Everything jumps around, never keeping the subject on one scene. The theme 'happiness' is very strong and to the point. This is the only consistent thing in the poem. (thats not a bad thing)

    ReplyDelete
  10. You know how you have to type in a word in order to get your post published? I had to type in happiness. No joke.

    ReplyDelete
  11. but then it was lixherp. yuck.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The thing I love about Ashbery's work is that he is not guiding you to believe what he believes. I don't feel like he's trying to dictate but offer a window into so many places your mind could go with his work. One reason why Ashbery's work is so appealing, is the way in which it is written. His poetry deals with the verbal impact of poetic language and it is amplified by the Sistena. By using the sistena writing style he can display each line better so it can be read where the language is better enhanced.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Sestinas has become a favorite, so I decided to create my own, here is a snippet

    Museuem

    It is everywhere and in all the frames-colors
    The silouette of the statue
    Decorating the irrevelant wall
    It is absolutely necessary to stare and point
    Glancing at various footsteps as people are walking
    The portraits are astonishing

    Astonishing are our reactions
    To the bold and vibrant colors
    As the people notice the statue
    Because it illuminates against the walls
    The woman pointed
    towards it, in front of me he is walking

    ReplyDelete