Sunday, May 8, 2011

Maya Deren


Amy Wong

Brief Info about Maya Deren

Maya Deren was born on April 29, 1917 in Kiev, Ukraine with the birth name of Eleanora Derenkowksy. But with the influence of her second husband, Alexander Hammid, she changes name to Maya. Maya Deren had three husbands, where two were divorced. Deren was an independent filmmaker, who constantly writes, travels, and lectures to support her films.
Deren moved to the US in 1922 with her parents. Her father was a psychiatrist while her mother was an artist. Deren studied journalism and political science at Syracuse University. After marrying her first husband, Gregory Bardacke, she moved to New York City; finished her studies and received her BA at NYU. Deren received her MA in English Literature from Smith College in 1939. During the same year, she had her first divorce.
Deren married Alexander Hammid, a filmmaker, in 1942. With the help of Hammid, Deren made her first short film in 1943, Meshes of the Afternoon. Throughout Deren’s life, she made six short films and several incomplete films. While traveling to Haiti, Deren shot over 20,000 feet of footage.
Deren died at the age of 44 on October 13, 1961 due to massive cerebral hemorrhage. Twelve years after her death, Teiji Ito, Deren’s third husband, and Ito’s second wife, Cherel Winnett, edited Deren’s footage of Haiti and titled Divine Horseman: The Living Gods of Haiti.


Meshes of the Afternoon 1943



Maya Deren appears in most of her films. Deren casts as the main lead in Meshes of the Afternoon. This film was presented as a dreamlike sequence. This film felt like a poem which repeats several lines, but in each section, it reveals new details about what is happening. After watching the film, you may want to question whether she is sleeping on the sofa or is she chasing the mirror masked person. Also, you may question whether she is dreaming or is it reality. In the beginning of the film, Deren presents the shadow movements, hand and feet appearing, and background music. All of these components display a sense of mystery and creepy feeling. Watching this film reveals the feeling of one’s experience of an incident.
The slow motion movement of Deren running up the stairs reveals the intensity of what is going to happen up stairs. As Deren enters the room, her body movement shows an evil force is pushing or preventing her from entering the room. The way she moves also displays a sense of illusion which is telling the audience that she is dreaming. This film also shows a sight confusion of dream and reality.


Ritual in Transfigured Time 1946



Maya Deren casts as the supporting role in Ritual in Transfigured Time. This film appears like a dream. The constant changes in the sceneries present the film to be timeless. As the actress kept running, she ran into a ball room. In the ball room, she encounter a guy, but the scenery changes after they separated from each other and now the motions continues in a different place. The actors’ movements were performed like they were dancing. All the movements in the film seemed like an everlasting dance. In the outside scenery, the movements of the actor and how it was edited shows a sense of confusion between reality and illusion. The actor seemed like a statue, but it would always suddenly move. The actress seems to be scared, so she runs away from this constantly pausing and moving person.


Katrina T. Simmons

Meditation on Violence



The actor is displayed with a lot of movement and a reflection can be seen on the wall almost like a mirror image, similar to her film In the Mirror of Maya Deren. In the first scene with the white wall, the actor dances soft and angelic. The movements are bigger and it helps puts more emphasis on the body. Oppose to the black wall where all of his movements are intense and sharp. With the intense and sharp moves the details in the body itself shows emotion. The strain of the arms displays more muscle than would the soft moves behind the white wall. Then he stands in between a white and black wall where everything is combined. He alternates between soft and intense movement, displaying passion and emotion throughout. Deren to me does this to show a basic difference in the movements the body could have. Just like when it came to the poet O’ Hara and being able to understand exactly what poetry should be, Deren shows there’s different ways the body can move.


The Eye of Night 1958




The symbol of the Gemini, displayed with two bodies in movement as one of the opening scene, shows the different ways movement, even if stationary, can be displayed. In this film The Eye of Night 1958, Deren presents the night sky, one of the natural movements of nature. Exploiting what we don’t take time to observe and understand that they are constantly moving. There are dancers featured in white, similar to the negative from still shots. The dancers are shown in constant movement representing what Deren views of the night’s sky. Deren takes ballet to a whole different experience by showing it in a simple form of black and white without the strong presence of a background or musical effects, like other ballets. The great contrast allows for us to observe the body movements more clearly.


At Land



In At Land again Deren focuses on movement, showing the flow of the oceans wave and then Deren’s body as the waves hit her. The part that sticks out the most was when she was on the sand and then she began pulling herself up on the piece of tree and ends up at the table. The way in which it is filmed, allows the audience to take part in every move she makes. After alternating scenes of her moving across the table and moving through nature, she ends up at a chess game. I thought this was funny since the films are about movement and she captures a chess game, where the whole game is about movement and the success of winning the game, comes from how intelligent and skillful the moves are.

I would describe myself as a real world evolutionist. If things had set rules and everyone had to abide by them than life would be boring, but because people are willing to think outside of the box and experiment, life becomes interesting. Everything that people do is a stepping stone for generations to come. Film to me is whatever the film maker believes it to be when they are constructing their work.

11 comments:

  1. “The invented event..., though itself an artifice, borrows reality from the reality of the scene -- from the natural blowing of the hair, the irregularity of the waves, the very texture of the stones and sand -- in short, from all the uncontrolled, spontaneous elements which are the property of actuality itself. Only in photography -- by the delicate manipulation which I call controlled accident -- can natural phenomena be incorporated into our own creativity, to yield an image where the reality of a tree confers its truth upon the events we cause to transpire beneath it.”
    - Maya Deren, from “Cinematography: The Creative Use of Reality”

    It’s fair to say that most popular cinema -- although, I am hesitant to cast such a wide net as there are, certainly, a plethora of examples that say otherwise -- isn’t interested in the art of the moving picture but is more concerned with the art of narrative and character, storytelling. Cinema, and the novel as well, is treated as a medium of transference, where moving visuals or language is used as a vessel for storytelling, finding means to translate a narrative, settings, characters to an audience. If one were not worried about the translation of storytelling via a secondhand medium that finds its gravity in the popularity of the medium, storytellers would still be viva voce. Even so, this oral communication of a crafted story wouldn’t be getting down to where the phenomena of the story or character is at its most prescient. If we were really interested in story and character, we would have more artists who craft themselves into a living artifice of their story, which a few have done such as Ray Johnson, Andy Warhol and, inadvertently, Henry Darger and Wesley Willis. Maya Deren may rank up with these “characters,” considering her eventual immersion into Haitian Voodu, which was a total giving of herself to the narrative of ritual, the most recurrent narrative element in her work. It’s as if she finally transformed herself and gave into that which she couldn’t escape and struggled with transposing in her work.

    Ultra-sensitive to the limitations and the evolution of cinema as an art form, Deren refers to the “latent form” of motion pictures, a form whose “profusion of potentialities seems to create confusion in the minds of most film-makers.” Rhythm, visuality, juxtaposition, abstraction, drama, movement: These are only a selection of the possibilities of the medium, but these are characteristics that are shared by other other arts (music, painting, poetry, literature, theatre, and dance, respectively). So what is the essential element of motion pictures, one that is unshared and unique to the medium? It’s not its ability to tell a story more artfully than we can tell a story.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz3wscJMbuo

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maya reminds me of an Andy Warhol kind of artist, as you mentioned Ted. Its all about the idea and not so much of the execution.

    ReplyDelete
  3. From Robert:

    Maya reminds me of an Andy Warhol kind of artist, as you mentioned, Ted. Its all about the idea and not so much of the execution.

    ReplyDelete
  4. From Lauren:

    “ The invented event” as Deren would say, “borrows reality from reality”



    Interesting thought, I have never thought about that so eloquently, the camera as a means to life.



    I believe it true, as was noted that in general films are more geared toward character and narrative. Art films, rarely have room in theaters next to Thor and Transformers 2. Unfortunately.



    I truly admire filmmakers like Deren. I don’t think all filmmakers can call themselves artists, but she is an artist tried and true. She is more concerned with movement, with capturing the little beauties of life ---hair blowing through the wind, water moving at a rhythmic pace. Rather than taking the viewer with them to someone’s crazy holiday weekend with the family, she would rather make you think about what you saw.



    I watched the posted video of the flower time lapse. It’s a good example of the element that is unique to only the motion picture. Movement. You can obviously tell a story just as if not more artfully through writing, singing. (as writing and singing are way more crafted devices than the 120 year old film device)

    Excluding the flip book, splicing together frames per second is the only way to borrow reality, and tweak it the way you would a story. It allows you to see exactly what the auteur wants you to see, unlike if you were reading a book although given some visual cues, it being up to you to build what you’d like to see.

    Take the flower time lapse. Us, the viewer see many flowers coming to bloom quicker than it actually happened. There are an infinite amount of meanings behind that. Does the filmmaker want to express life? Do they want to say kids grow up too fast?

    We don’t know, but unlike any other medium, we see it. If we were just to read it, “flowers growing rapidly” it wouldn’t have the same effect, and most likely not evoke all the possibilities of the meaning.

    ReplyDelete
  5. From John:

    Upon watching this video, I really thought Maya was totally crazy. I still think she's crazy but I think despite all the that her work holds a great deal of meaning. It was hard for me to take her seriously especially when I heard about her being into Vodou and all this nonsense. While watching "Meshes of the Afternoon," I kept thinking this makes no sense. She is having a dream, what does this mean? Then I thought, When do dreams ever make sense? I have a hard time interpreting my own dreams. How am I supposed to try to understand someone else's dream? I think this film deals more with a personal struggle. We all have struggles so I this definitely interested me. The whole subconscious mind freaks me out a bit but is amazing. The fact that our mind interprets experiences and feelings that we can't even understand is fascinating. I always have dreams that I don't understand. I do know that my dreams reflect my experiences and things I am feeling. All in all, Dreams and thoughts in general are amazing. The subconscious mind is also insane. The woman and people in her films are obviously experiencing things that are unexplainable to us. Whenever you put something in you mind, it will spit something crazier back at you and you probably wont understand it. We may not be able to relate to the exact experiences of the people in the film but we can relate to the fact that we all have personal experiences and subconscious thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with John. She's a nut. Although there's a fine line between passion and craziness and I'm 100% sure that she crosses over once in awhile. I am sure she loves what she does...only because I think someone who loves their work can make crazy stuff.

    But other than that...there are moments in her pieces where even I (someone who doesn't really like the entire thing) goes "Wow...that's actually pretty cool." So even if you don't like it, there are still things to appreciate about her style and work.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't really believe she was nuts... I actully loved her films more than all the other filmakers i've seen in class. Her films is one of a kind,very dramatic and dream like. If the film was projected onto a large screen I believe the experience would be totally different. When watching her films I feel like im being transported into her mind, thoughts, perspective and her dreams.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm not really sure if i get this whole chess piece thing? Maybe I was nt paying enough attention as I usually do. But I do love the way this film was shot most of all i like the different crazy effects that happen through out the film. I would have to agree with Shirley and say I don;t believe she was crazy either. I think she had a strong passion for what she does and sometimes it difficult for others to grasp others emotions certainly that of what she was trying to evoke upon her audience. Perhaps no one see the world as she does but I have a vague idea that she sees things in rhythms and beats.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Where as the poets we've discuss, infuse their life into their poems, Maya use her film to express her art and what she loves. The fact that there are no sound, I think gives the viewers a more personal connection. If sound was added it would change the dynamic of the film. Interestingly enough, she is adventurous and she does things outside the box, whatever that box maybe.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I must admit that it was not until watching Maya Deren's work that I was able to understand the similarities betweem film and literature. This was truly the first time I was able to see film evoke the same emotions that poetry usually does for me. I have a feeling that is due to the silence though. Without words I was forced to pay more attention to facial expressions, thereby getting a closer look at what was actually going on, on the surface and I could guess as to what was going on beyond that.

    ReplyDelete
  11. When looking at the movies i was surprise at the amount of various elements that she used to get the viewer's attention, although it was a silent film it was very clutter and sparactic. there were alot of signifers in there and trying to connect them all was a task within themselves. The beauty of the movies being silent were that one could put his/her self in a situation such as the dinner party and envision what the individuals were saying to one another. After i got the background information on Deren i was shocked to be informed of the voodoo background and the innate pull she had to something so far fetch. The way she displayed the motions of her chracters bodies was refreshing and enticing and forced the viewer to pay closer attention. She was slated to be a choreographer and that came out through her films and the act of dancing was a resonating theme.

    ReplyDelete