Sunday, March 13, 2011

Kenneth Koch

Katz, Alex. "Portrait of a Poet: Kenneth Koch." 1970.


O what a physical effect it has on me
To dive forever into the light blue sea
Of your acquaintance!
- Kenneth Koch

Kenneth Koch was born in Cincinnati, Ohio; on February 27, 1925. After high school he enlisted into the army and became a rifleman in the Philippines. He studied at Harvard University where he received his Bachelor of Arts degree and earned a PhD at Columbia University. While working on his doctorate, Koch taught at Columbia University, Rutgers University, and Brooklyn College. He has been on the Columbia faculty since 1959, becoming a full professor in 1971. (poemhunter.com)

Kenneth Koch was a member of what was known as the New York School of Poets. The four most prominent members were Frank O’Hara, Kenneth Koch, John Ashbery, and James Shuyler. Kenneth Koch was the only heterosexual in the group. All attended Harvard except for James Shuyler and apart from John Ashbery served in the military. Kenneth Koch was married twice during his lifetime. He met his first wife, Janice Elwood, 19, 1951. Three years later in 1954 the two married and spent some time in Italy and France. Kenneth and Janice had a daughter, Katherine, who was born in 1955. Janice Elwood died in 1981. In 1994 Koch married Karen Culler. Kenneth Koch died in 2002 from Leukemia. (http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/kenneth-koch)

His poetry was known as lyrical, humorous, and blunt works of literature that can convince the reader he is speaking to a subject instead of about them. The humor in his works provides an opportunity for the reader to comprehend the expression of emotion. For instance in the poem “The Bricks” , “the bricks in a wall sang this song we shall not fall the whole day long but white and small lie in abandon”, where he gave objects a voice, personality, and purpose. Koch had the ability to give raw emotion from inanimate objects. Koch tended to lead the reader into the midst of his poems where he can release various emotions such as madness, humor, and love.

In the poem “To You”, he expresses his emotions about an individual that is in love and its depth. He wrote “I love you as sheriff searches for a walnut that will solve a murder case unsolved for years”, conveying that he would do the impossible to grasp and sustain love. A walnut is so small, how is it possible to find it? Searching for a walnut to solve a murder case would seem inconceivable and ludicrous to any individual. Koch wrote, “I think I am bicycling across an Africa of green and white fields, always, to be near you, even in my heart…”, another impossible act considering the cornfields are extremely high and too crowded with growing corn. This seems to be foolish but isn’t that how human act when in love? Koch confirms that he is acting crazy by writing,”…I am crazier that shirttails….”, though the Shirttails were a downtown New York City gang who would wear their shirt outside their pants as a form a unity and method to carry and conceal multiple weapons at once. They were known to be a pretty ruthless gang. He expresses his feelings of doing the impossible just to be with his love. Koch wrote “…For this we love, and we live because we love….” which expresses the importance of love in our lives.

Koch had the ability to express his desires and comprehend what important factors are missing from daily life. In the poem Desire for Spring, he wrote, “Calcium days, days when we feed or bones! Iron days, which enrich our blood...When, will there be a perfectly ordinary spring day? For my heart needs to be fed, not my urine”, where comparison has the role of mediation between his yearning and a certain point of the year. In describing physical parts of the body which are not being sated, he is implying physical love is acceptable but emotional is needed. His usage of sarcasm portrays that an individual can state his/her feelings in poems without divulging their literal meaning. For example, he wrote, “Nothing else will satisfy me, not even in death! Not even broken life insurances policies, cancer, loss of health” the irony of this phrase is that those incidences are not satisfying but a testament to a inadequate individual.

Koch constantly describes his emotions throughout various poems that state his personal views on happiness, love, and disdain. In the poem, In Love with You, he straddles the line between sarcasm and the endearment that foreshadows his opinion. He wrote “I love you fame I love you raining sun I love you cigarettes I love you love I love you daggers I love smiles daggers and symbolism.” Professing his affection for symbolism or imagery is a demonstration that being aware of your own sentiment is a profound reward. He stated, “Aren’t my eyes bigger than love?” is similar to the phrase “eyes too big for stomach”, where your eyes think and want to eat more than it can. We think Koch being humorous by expecting too much from love or that his idea of love is over the top.

Kenneth Koch’s poetry is more like Dr. Seuss and less like Edgar Allen Poe. His humor shows in all of his poems. There’s no deep or serious emotion from “To You”. His imagery transforms from serious to funny. His work is innovative compared to his fellow colleagues. For example:

           I love you as a Kid searches for a goat;
           I am crazier than shirttails
           In the wind, when you're near…

Furthermore in the poem “The Bricks” he somehow personifies objects and gives them life. The reader’s typical idea is that these bricks have no other purpose but to be built up or torn down. Koch’s viewpoint is to enjoy these bricks just as they are, not for only for their function. In the quote :

           The brick on the wall
           Sang this song
           “we shall not fall
           the whole day long
           But white and small lie in abandon.”

In this poem the two lovers, the animals and the bricks all exist in one place and time. All of these are a foundation for something. This writing is so simple and yet it is unified. The idea of any object person or animal can be appreciated with its existence. In “Yet in Desire For Spring” Koch shows his strong need for this season. Perhaps for him it’s a resource to renewing the body, and revival for the soul. Its warmth brings such joy and is needed just as much as air to breathe. Spring is a medicine, which heals and nourishes us. People usually look forward to Spring after such a harsh, brutal winter. His need for spring is essential to his spirit. Spring is not longer just a season. There’s much more behind Spring than just blooming flowers, birds chirping and rain showers and bright colors.

Here are some of the poems we decided to analyze:

- To You
- The Bricks
- Desire for Spring
- In Love with You

Here are certain recordings that can provide insight into his mind and personality:

http://www.archive.org/details/Kenneth_Koch_lecture_June_1979_79P009

http://writing.upenn.edu/pennsound/x/Koch.php

Food for Thought:

1. Why is comparison a constant factor in Koch’s work?
2. Should he be specified as a comical poet?
3. How do you feel about the poem To You? Does an individual succumb to wild and fanatical act while in love?
4. What do you think Koch means when he says, “Aren’t my eyes bigger than love?”
5. In comparison from Koch’s work how is his work different or similar to Frank O’Hara’s writing?

Here are a couple of poems we have discussed:


To You

I love you as a sheriff searches for a walnut
That will solve a murder case unsolved for years
Because the murderer left it in the snow beside a window
Through which he saw her head, connecting with
Her shoulders by a neck, and laid a red
Roof in her heart. For this we live a thousand years;
For this we love, and we live because we love, we are not
Inside a bottle, thank goodness! I love you as a
Kid searches for a goat; I am crazier than shirttails

In the wind, when you're near, a wind that blows from
The big blue sea, so shiny so deep and so unlike us;
I think I am bicycling across an Africa of green and white fields
Always, to be near you, even in my heart
When I'm awake, which swims, and also that I believe that you
Are trustworthy as the sidewalk which leads me to
The place where I think of you, a new
Harmony of thoughts! I love you as the sunlight leads the prow
Of a ship which sails from Hartford to Miami, and I love you
Best at dawn, when even before I am awake the sun
Receives me in the questions which you always pose.


In Love with You

           1
O what a physical effect it has on me
To dive forever into the light blue sea
Of your acquaintance! Ah, but dearest friends,
Like forms, are finished, as life has ends! Still,
It is beautiful, when October
Is over, and February is over,
To sit in the starch of my shirt, and to dream of your sweet
Ways! As if the world were a taxi, you enter it, then
Reply (to no one), “Let’s go five or six blocks.”
Isn’t the blue stream that runs past you a translation from the Russian?
Aren’t my eyes bigger than love?
Isn’t this history, and aren’t we a couple of ruins?
Is Carthage Pompeii? is the pillow the bed? is the sun
What glues our heads together? O midnight! O midnight!
Is love what we are,
Or has happiness come to me in a private car
That’s so very small I’m amazed to see it there?

           2
We walk through the park in the sun, and you say, “There’s a spider
Of shadow touching the bench, when morning’s begun.” I love you.
I love you fame I love you raining sun I love you cigarettes I love you love
I love you daggers I love smiles daggers and symbolism.

           3
Inside the symposium of your sweetest look’s
Sunflower awning by the nurse-faced chrysanthemums childhood
Again represents a summer spent sticking knives into porcelain raspberries, when China’s
Still a country! Oh, King Edward abdicated years later, that’s
Exactly when. If you were seventy thousand years old, and I were a pill,
I know I could cure your headache, like playing baseball in drinking-water, as baskets
Of towels sweetly touch the bathroom floor! O benches of nothing
Appear and reappear—electricity! I’d love to be how
You are, as if
The world were new, and the selves were blue
Which we don
Until it’s dawn,
Until evening puts on
The gray hooded selves and the light brown selves of . . .
Water! your tear-colored nail polish
Kisses me! and the lumberyard seems new
As a calm
On the sea, where, like pigeons,
I feel so mutated, sad, so breezed, so revivified, and still so unabdicated—
Not like an edge of land coming over the sea!


Variations on a Theme by William Carlos Williams

1
I chopped down the house that you had been saving to live in next summer.
I am sorry, but it was morning, and I had nothing to do
and its wooden beams were so inviting.

2
We laughed at the hollyhocks together
and then I sprayed them with lye.
Forgive me. I simply do not know what I am doing.

3
I gave away the money that you had been saving to live on for the next ten years.
The man who asked for it was shabby
and the firm March wind on the porch was so juicy and cold.

4
Last evening we went dancing and I broke your leg.
Forgive me. I was clumsy and
I wanted you here in the wards, where I am the doctor!


The background information and similar ideas:
Koch, Kenneth. The Collected Poems of Kenneth Koch. First Printing edition November 1, 2005.

16 comments:

  1. Just a quick note.

    I'm going to post an actual comment sometime this week, but I want to make sure that you read at a few other important poems of Koch's. Also, please print out and bring copies to class of the poems that are being focused on for discussion.

    Posted above:
    - Variations on a Theme by W. C. W.

    From "Sun Out":
    - The Dead Body (Note: Think about how this may relate to O'Hara's poem that we discussed in class.)
    - En l'An Trentiesme de Mon Eage

    From "Thank You...":
    - The Circus (Note: Think about Mekas' portrayal of the circus.)
    - The History of Jazz
    - The Artist

    From the Course Pack:
    - On Aesthetics

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would agree with any individual who considered Koch a comical poet, as long as the sentence didn't end there.
    After reading Koch's poetry it is completely clear that he has a gift of relating unrelated things and situations to evoke a feeling. He does an incredible job relating emotions of love, surprise, and every day life that makes you glad you're a human being, and also capable of feeling that way. So yes, he incorporates humor into his poetry and does a really fantastic job at charming the reader, but his humor has a purpose greater than a laugh. He endears the reader. He hits you at a level that if you can't relate with, you've been let down as a person (so far at least).
    " If you were seventy thousand years old, and I were a pill,
    "I know I could cure your headache, like playing baseball in drinking-water, as baskets
    Of towels sweetly touch the bathroom floor!"
    He's finding beauty and insight--and an ideal philosophy of love in every day life in our every day deal. Headaches, absurdity, laundry-- not exactly the inspiration of our lives, but hey they're part of it, no? And you feel it, in the moment, and it's completely valid.

    And writing it down, for Koch, solidified it.

    Also, I think what Koch meant when he said " aren't my eyes bigger than love?" was himself admitting how much he's romanticizing being in love. Like the Professor said, he's aware of his own sentiment--and believes it to be a powerful thing. This justifies his means to use it. He's kind of joking to himself (and the reader) how crazy he knows he is. That's very charming.


    I really appreciate his structure as well as his admiration of the simple, most certainly. I can relate to Koch more so than any other poet I have yet to read.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Lauren, I like the way Koch draws upon every day occurrences to in his poem. When reading Koch's poems, you feel as though you are there with him as he is writing. He allows the reader to see even the smallest of details often overlooked. My favorite and there are a few, is "To Orgasm," in my opinion it is playful and sensuous. I can only imagine being in the presence of Koch, O'Hara and Ashbery.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When reading Koch I can see where he speaks of objects and applies personification. This allows the reader to think outside of the box and truly understand what emotions he is trying to portray. From “To You” it is obviously that Koch truly believes in love because he states “we love, and we live because we love.” It was as if saying if we couldn’t love then we wouldn’t really be living. This reminded me of “Walden: Diaries, Notes and Sketches” where across the screen “I make home movies therefore I live, I live therefore I make home movies,” is displayed. It shows how dedicated and how much something can mean. Koch does a good job writing poems, while reading “To You” one of the personifications that stood out was “…trustworthy as the sidewalk.” I don’t think of the sidewalk as having human characteristics, I think and treat it like an object but Koch makes it become a form of dependence. We trust the sidewalk to be there so we could get to our locations safely. We don’t consider the sidewalk falling from under us like a friendship could fold; it was very interesting to look at it that way.
    “Aren’t my eyes bigger than love?” That is sarcasm. Love is something he cares deeply about so why would he compare what love should entail to the size of his eyes. I interpreted his love as being so big that it can’t be compared to anything. In the line “Or has happiness come to me in a private car that’s so very small. I’m amazed to see it there?” I feel like this is evident on why his eye can’t be compared to love. He is even amazed that the person he loves, the thing that makes him happy can be compacted into a person. How could a feeling so strong and a love so big, exist in a person? He is displaying his sarcasm and does it in a great way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is Emma's comment:

    I agree with Lauren's statement, " I would agree with any individual who considered Koch a comical poet, as long as the sentence didn't end there."
    I want another word to be used in place of comical. A word that can encompass the idea of taking the images we are used to and exploring the feelings behind them. Koch didn't use verbose sentences or superlative language to explain "love" or other subjects. He used common objects and ideals to express himself. I don't see Koch as satirical or ironic, I think it is more literal and lyrical. As Professor Dodson said, poetry is not meant to be confusing. Koch is so plain in his poetry, it is what makes it so amazing to us. You can tell he didn't pour over a thesaurus or other text books of poetry. He wrote exactly what he saw and how it made him feel. He spoke to inanimate objects and animate ones. He used all his senses and surroundings at his disposal.
    I think this idea is best seen in "On Aesthetics."
    Koch takes ordinary objects, people, ideas, etc and explains them in the simplest language he can.
    I wish I knew how to explain how beautiful I think Aesthetics of Creating Light is. Or Aesthetics of Stone? That is the most profound and perfect example I can think of to explain POETRY.
    He takes these ideas and stretches them. Making us see his thought process, in order for us to explore our own ways of thinking.
    Koch once remarked that “Children have a natural talent for writing poetry and anyone who teaches them should know that.”
    -Emma Karin

    ReplyDelete
  6. Koch has an interesting way of selectively picking the imagery that he wants you to think of, also while provoking and enforcing his ideas of love. You can distinctively see the influence that New York City has had on his thought process and how he mixes the idea of nature with New York City imagery. He wants the reader to be safely entrenched behind a wall of his thoughts. He leaves no rule unbroken to actively play with ones perception, by tying together simple objects with sentimental rhetoric. Just as you begin to understand his structure, he shakes you off with constant humor and statements that force you not to commit to any one particular idea or image.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I love Koch's constant use of metaphor. I feel his poetry is made to be understood in simpilicity. Like Emma said the professor told us that poetry is not meant to be confusing nor to trick you. Koch in my opinion is the essence of simple heart felt poetry. His poetry is similar to O'Hara's in that it is from everyday life and experiences. He takes about his love and his yearning for love and I feel that when he says "aren't my eyes bigger than love" he he simply expressing his need for love and passion, that all he wants is over simplified love maybe too much love. His humor throughout his poetry brings light to what he writes. i feel that it is again a way to simplify his feelings. I love the use of personification and metaphor.
    -Annmarie

    ReplyDelete
  8. Koch does write good poems but in my opinion, the simplicity can be a little too...simple. I know that the Professor said that poetry isn't mean to be confusing and whatnot but I do like to analyze a poem once in awhile. This is just my own opinion and if there's nothing to really think about, it can get a little...unsatisfying.

    Now I'm not saying that Koch's poetry isn't good, it is. My favorite lines are:

    "I chopped down the house that you had been saving to live in next summer.
    I am sorry, but it was morning, and I had nothing to do
    and its wooden beams were so inviting."

    I think that must be the funniest thing I have ever read in a poem. His bluntness is actually rather funny in "Variations on a Theme by William Carlos Williams"

    ReplyDelete
  9. BOILING WATER
    A serious moment for the water is
    when it boils
    And though one usually regards it
    merely as a convenience
    To have the boiling water
    available for bath or table
    Occasionally there is someone
    around who understands
    The importance of this moment
    for the water—maybe a saint,
    Maybe a poet, maybe a crazy
    man, or just someone
    temporarily disturbed
    With his mind "floating"in a
    sense, away from his deepest
    Personal concerns to more
    "unreal" things...

    A serious moment for the island
    is when its trees
    Begin to give it shade, and
    another is when the ocean
    washes
    Big heavy things against its side.
    One walks around and looks at
    the island
    But not really at it, at what is on
    it, and one thinks,
    It must be serious, even, to be this
    island, at all, here.
    Since it is lying here exposed to
    the whole sea. All its
    Moments might be serious. It is
    serious, in such windy weather,
    to be a sail
    Or an open window, or a feather
    flying in the street...

    Seriousness, how often I have
    thought of seriousness
    And how little I have understood
    it, except this: serious is urgent
    And it has to do with change. You
    say to the water,
    It's not necessary to boil now,
    and you turn it off. It stops
    Fidgeting. And starts to cool. You
    put your hand in it
    And say, The water isn't serious
    any more. It has the potential,
    However—that urgency to give
    off bubbles, to
    Change itself to steam. And the
    wind,
    When it becomes part of a
    hurricane, blowing up the
    beach
    And the sand dunes can't keep it
    away.
    Fainting is one sign of
    seriousness, crying is another.
    Shuddering all over is another
    one.

    A serious moment for the
    telephone is when it rings.
    And a person answers, it is
    Angelica, or is it you.

    A serious moment for the fly is
    when its wings
    Are moving, and a serious
    moment for the duck
    Is when it swims, when it first
    touches water, then spreads
    Its smile upon the water...

    A serious moment for the match
    is when it burst into flame...

    Serious for me that I met you, and
    serious for you
    That you met me, and that we do
    not know
    If we will ever be close to anyone
    again. Serious the recognition
    of the probability
    That we will, although time
    stretches terribly in
    between...


    The way he expresses himself is amazing. When first reading this poem there were pieces that I understood separately, but as a whole I was lost till the end. He placed many different entities in his poem and personifies each of them, while also giving them an emotion that perfectly fits their character. Then at end he ties each of them to himself and his feelings. Then your left at the end in awe, because everything he said earlier comes together like a puzzle. It’s a strange way of expressing romance, but when reach the final lines, its like you understand what he might have felt.

    Elizabeth Nunez

    ReplyDelete
  10. When it comes to descriptions, it is always most effective when one uses comparisons to call for a sense of familiarity for the general public. Now, this is traditional comparison such as cute as a button or cool as a cucumber. I can think Sesame Street for providing me with these examples. But Koch pushes that familiarity further with a sense of sarcasm that makes him quite comical.
    In his poem 'To You', it's almost as if he's writing a satire. He's talking about an individual in love but I can't help but see it as him making fun of this person. That notion of 'love conquers all' is littered throughout the poem, that sense of impossibility being possible, it's unnerving. At times, it even sounds like he's saying love makes us stupid, as it would cause us to be victims to wild and fanatical acts, carried out by us undoubtedly. Although at some point, Koch asks, "Aren't my eyes bigger than love?" Allegedly, love is blind. One is supposed to be infatuated by the goodness that is within one's heart that it is reflected on the outside character of the person. Love, though blind, sees this. Koch, with his eyes being greater than love, carries that even further. It's almost spiritual even. It's what drives the individual.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I just wrote a huge long winded commentary on Koch and how he pays homage to William Carlos Williams and how much I appreciate that, and it was not able to be published. Here goes my second attempt:
    The first thing that struck me was Koch's poem "Variations on a Theme by William Carlos Williams" For those of you who are not familiar with WCW's work, this is a great poem that I feel says so much about him..
    The Red Wheelbarrow

    so much depends
    upon

    a red wheel
    barrow

    glazed with rain
    water

    beside the white
    chickens.

    Just as WCW does, Koch strives to find the beauty in every day things, and challenges his audience to accept such simple things as a work of art..poetry. The resemblance is also seen in the poem which was posted by some one else, "Boiling Water". I also must jump on the Lauren band wagon, and agree to only call Koch a comical poet would be doing him a great injustice. Without a doubt some of Koch's writing are comical and sarcastic, but they are romantic as well. To simply say he is comical would be to ignore the depth of his work.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Koch has interesting views on love. I like the line “Aren’t my eyes bigger than love?”
    I agree because one eyes may see a lot of things. It might be something more than what is expected. For example, one may see love as two people falling in love, getting together, and end up getting married. But if one's "eyes bigger than love" then one will expect to gain more than falling in love, getting together, and getting married. Like one will expect to have obstacles before getting together. For example, one of them might be dating someone or it could be a one sided love. If one sees more than love, one will expect to have ups and downs before getting married. As Prof. Dodson stated it "is similar to the phrase “eyes too big for stomach”, where your eyes think and want to eat more than it can." I agree with this because your eyes will expect more and want more than how love is.

    ReplyDelete
  14. In David Lehman's book, "The Last Avant-Garde" (some of which we read earlier this semester), Lehman recounts a common conversation that use to issue between Koch and O'Hara:
    "When [Koch] talked about O'Hara's comic techniques, he made it clear that the 'comic' was 'part of what is most serious for art to get to -- ecstasy, unity, freedom, completeness, dionysiac things.'" (236)

    Though Koch is speaking about instances of humor that arise in O'Hara's work, the same purposefulness he mentions can be applied to his own poetry as well because, well, he's an authority on humor -- let's say that he's the doctor.

    from Thank You
    "Oh thank you for giving me the chance / Of being ship's doctor! I am sorry that I shall have to refuse -- / But, you see, the most I know of medicine is orange flowers / Tilted in the evening light against a cashmere red / Inside which breasts invent the laws of light / And of night, where cashmere moors itself across the sea. / And thank you for giving me these quintuplets / To rear and make happy... My mind was on something else."

    Certainly, we've all had moments in which we have been misunderstood, and the most affable of these moments have invited a fair measure of chuckles, but rarely is the misunderstanding understood. Why did we laugh? When one thing is switched for another, is it the pure absurdity of the swap that elicits a laugh or is it that we've been enlivened, however briefly and unconsciously, to the potential variety of experience?

    Though this may only be skirting the surface, Koch is an active renderer and recorder of comic misunderstanding. This is not to say that Koch's comic sensibility is one-dimensional -- as a handful of you have already pointed out, to treat it as such would be an injustice -- or that he is some crackerjack double-speaker, but that misunderstanding is a method to express less salient meanings, to deepen understanding. This may be an interesting place to start investigating Koch's poetics.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Aesthetics of Being a box

    look forward to always containing
    what is contained
    whether it is dry
    or raining. then one morning early
    Someone may come by
    (this has been known to happen)
    Who will take
    your top off!and they will say
    Thus, thus! was this result obtained


    I appreciate the simplicity of this poem. Whenever we see a box the thought always come to mind "I wonder what is inside". Usually one cant wait to see. As was said by Koch,"what is contained". At times the recipient may have been dissatified with what it contains. The end of the poem stated...Thus thus!was the result obtained...which is a sentiment we sometimes share especially when you order something online.

    ReplyDelete
  16. When I i was reading Koch's poems it really puts a smile on my face because he takes the simplest things. The poem Boiling Water posted by Elizabeth really showed what kind of poet Koch truly is. He could take the simpliest things we take for granted like boiling water and create a materpiece. Koch writes his poems with such imagery, compare and contrating. His poems are really straight foward but at the sametime he adds adventure and comedy to it. as Koch stated in Boiling Water
    "seriousness, how often I have
    thought of seriousness
    And how little I have understood
    it"
    He started the sentence really straight foward then ends it with a comic remark.

    -Shirley Cai

    ReplyDelete